This is an early access version
Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cantonal Hospital Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cantonal Hospital Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cantonal Hospital Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
University Clinical Hospital Mostar , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina
University Clinical Center Tuzla , Tuzla , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cantonal Hospital Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Aim To compare outcomes and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) between single-level laminectomy (SLL) and two-level laminectomy (TLL) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Methods This prospective study included 119 patients with confirmed LSS who underwent SLL or TLL at Cantonal Hospital Zenica from January 2018 to January 2025. Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSSQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, along with evaluation of motor, sensory, and urinary function. MCID values were used to assess meaningful improvement.
Results At six months, SLL patients had lower ODI (15.0 vs. 18.0, p = 0.006), VAS-LB (3.0 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001), and SSSQ scores (17.2 vs. 21.6, p < 0.001) than TLL patients. Motor deficits (14.8% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.019) and urinary dysfunction at 1 month (5.7% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.013) were less frequent in SLL. More SLL patients achieved MCID for ODI (80.7% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.024) and SSSQ (73.9% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.017) at 6 months, with TLL patients 28% and 34% less likely to reach MCID for ODI and SSSQ, respectively. No significant differences were found preoperatively or at 1 month.
Conclusion The study suggests that SLL and TLL have comparable outcomes, with a slight tendency toward better functional improvement and fewer deficits after SLL.
Conceptualization, E.B., H.B., F.A., A.M. and G.L.; Data curation, E.B. and M.H.; Formal Analysis, E.B. and L.B.; Investigation, E.B., H.B., F.A., A.M. and G.L.; Software, E.B. and H.B.; Writing – original draft, E.B., H.B., L.B. and M.H.; Methodology, G.L.; Writing – review & editing, L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
None.
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
0
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.