×
Home Current Archive Editorial Team
Contact
Original article

This is an early access version

Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poorer histopathological differentiation in colorectal cancer: a study from a Southeast Asian Tertiary Hospital

By
Edwin Saleh Siregar ,
Edwin Saleh Siregar

Surgery, Medicine, University of North Sumatra , Medan , Indonesia

Muhammad Al Anas Orcid logo ,
Muhammad Al Anas

Surgery, Medicine, University of North Sumatra , Medan , Indonesia

Dedy Hermansyah Orcid logo
Dedy Hermansyah
Contact Dedy Hermansyah

Surgery, Medicine, University of North Sumatra , Medan , Indonesia

Editor: SELMA UZUNOVIĆ

Abstract

Aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pre-treatment NLR and histopathological differentiation in colorectal cancer, and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of NLR as a predictive biomarker.

Methods A retrospective study was conducted at Adam Malik Haji Center General Hospital Medan, North Sumatera. Medical records of 45 colorectal cancer patients treated between January and December 2024 were reviewed. Pre-treatment NLR values were calculated from peripheral blood counts. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine diagnostic performance, and correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between NLR and tumour grade.

Results The mean NLR was 6.33±4.92. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.874, indicating excellent diagnostic ability. An NLR cutoff value of 6.25 provided a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 72.5% for predicting poor histopathological differentiation. A moderate positive correlation (r=0.612; p<0.001) was found between higher NLR values and poorer differentiation.

Conclusion Pre-treatment NLR correlated with histopathological grade and showed promise as a simple, non-invasive biomarker for assessing tumour aggressiveness in colorectal cancer.

Author Contributions

Data curation, E.S.S., M.A.A. and D.H.; Formal Analysis, E.S.S. and M.A.A.; Investigation, E.S.S. and D.H.; Software, E.S.S. and M.A.A.; Supervision, E.S.S. and D.H.; Visualization, E.S.S., M.A.A. and D.H.; Writing – original draft, E.S.S., M.A.A. and D.H.; Writing – review & editing, E.S.S. and M.A.A.; Methodology, M.A.A.; Conceptualization, D.H.; Funding acquisition, D.H.; Project administration, D.H.; Resources, D.H.; Validation, D.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Citation

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding Statement

The author declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.