This is an early access version
,
pediatrics, university of Mosul/college of medicine , mosul , Iraq
,
Ninevah University/college of medicine , mosul , Iraq
Pediatrics, university of Mosul/college of medicine , mosul , Iraq
Aim To determine the frequency and identify predictors of Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure in neonates of varying gestational ages in a resource-limited setting, where CPAP is often used beyond the preterm population.
Methods prospective observational study of 119 neonates started on CPAP within 24 hours of birth for respiratory distress. We collected Demographic, clinical, and perinatal data. CPAP failure was defined by persistent hypoxia or severe respiratory distress despite maximal settings, necessitating mechanical ventilation. Univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses identify predictors of CPAP failure.
Results The CPAP failure rate was 33.6%. Univariate analysis identified lower gestational age ( ≤ 30 weeks), lower birth weight (≤1200 g), female sex, vaginal delivery, and a 5-minute Apgar score < 7 as significant predictors. However, in the multivariable model, only a 5-minute Apgar score < 7 remained an independent predictor (Adjusted Odds Ratio AOR 5.315; p=0.006). Antenatal corticosteroid, age at CPAP initiation, and initial Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO)₂ were not significant.
Neonates with birth weight <1200g had shorter duration of successful CPAP use as revealed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p<0.001)
Conclusion This study confirms that CPAP failure is a frequent and serious problem in our resource-limited NICU. A low 5-minute Apgar score is a significant predictor of failure. To save more newborns, we must focus on improving neonatal resuscitation and make clear guidelines for respiratory care in our specific context.
Conceptualization, N.S.Y.; Data curation, N.S.Y.; Formal Analysis, N.S.Y.; Investigation, A.K.I.; Methodology, A.K.I.; Project administration, A.K.I.; Validation, A.A.; Writing – original draft, A.A.; Writing – review & editing, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
yes
no
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
0
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.